Author
Table Of Contents
Automation testing has significantly evolved over the past decade to adapt to the pace of technological advancements and shifting business needs. In today’s dynamic environment, automation testing is vital for improving efficiency, scalability, and adaptability of products.
By automating test processes, companies can achieve faster test execution, less manual errors, and consistent quality which can be maintained across diverse platforms. This accelerates the development cycle and also helps organizations to respond swiftly to market changes and technological innovations. Thus, ensuring their products remain competitive and resilient in a fast-evolving landscape.
Return on investment (ROI) in automation tools helps organizations to determine and justify whether investment on tools is adding any value to the organization. Further, in future, will it help in cost and time saving.
To accurately calculate the ROI of test automation, businesses should not rely solely on comparing the time it takes to manually test a case versus automating it.
Instead, it’s important to consider additional factors such as the time required for implementation, ongoing maintenance, and analyzing test failures. These elements significantly impact the overall return on investment.
Moreover, while tangible metrics are important, some benefits are harder to quantify, such as reduced time to market, enhanced platform performance, and increased confidence in the software. These advantages may not be immediately visible at the beginning of your automation project but become more apparent as the project advances.
Some important aspects of test automation ROI metrics to look at are:
Image credit :Chris Schwartz
Productivity gain measures how the investment in automation tools lead to improved processes and faster delivery of the product. How positively it has impacted the overall productivity of the team.
Measuring ROI (Return on Investment) through productivity gains involves calculating how investment on Automation tools and learning has translated into increased productivity and financial gains.
The Return on Investment can be calculated based on below parameters:
The formula for ROI calculation is:
Where:
We are taking a simple example below for calculating cost benefit which concludes whether incorporation of automation was a hit for the company or a miss.
Tool cost per month (600,000/12) = 50,000
Traditional ROI metrics are essential for understanding the financial return of investments. Whereas, productivity gain as ROI offers a broader perspective, emphasizing mainly on efficiency and effectiveness improvements that may not quickly translate into direct financial gains but contribute to long-term success. The key difference between both are,
Traditional ROI: follows quantitative approach. Primarily focuses on Financial returns. Traditional ROI in software testing evaluates the profit on the investment made in testing activities. This is typically measured by the budgets saved by identifying and fixing defects early, as compared to the potential cost of those defects if they were found in later stages of development or in production.
Productivity ROI: follows qualitative approach, focusing on improvements in processes or efficiency that will in long course yield better financial returns. It focuses on
Aspects |
Traditional ROI metrics |
Productivity gain as ROI |
Formula |
There is no standardized formula. based on time savings, quality improvements, etc. |
|
Focus |
Financial outcomes. The cost saved from early defect detection and prevention. |
Efficiency, effectiveness, and long-term process improvements in Automation testing implementation and approaches. |
Application |
Justifying testing budgets and demonstrating financial risk mitigation. |
Enhancing development process efficiency, reducing rework, and improving overall product quality. |
Short vs long term Impact |
Mostly focused on short-term financial gains. |
Focuses on long-term process improvements and strategic benefits |
Direct vs In-direct benefits |
Direct financial benefits, such as reduced costs. |
Indirect benefits, such as improved team productivity and quick time-to-market. |
Relevance in Agile/DevOps |
It is less emphasized as these environments prioritize speed and efficiency. |
Highly relevant due to the focus on continuous integration and delivery. |
Example |
Saving $150,000 by preventing defects, with testing costs of $50,000 results in 200% ROI. |
Reducing testing time by 50% and increasing feature release rate by 20%. |
In-house tools vs low code tools have always been a topic of debate in organizations.
In-house tools are the software, developed and maintained within the organization.
Building In-house tool requires more money and time. But as they are developed by the company itself, software customization becomes very easy.
Pros:
Sensitive data is also secured, as third-party services simply cannot access your data, code and config files.
Cons:
Low cost tools require bare minimum coding experience for you to automate the testing process, test and ship the product to the market. These tools are user-friendly, provide faster solutions, are easy to learn, and can be made cost effective depending on purchasing features as per you need.
Pros:
Cons:
While selecting a tool, the question to be asked to derive a conclusion should be:
Criteria |
In-House Tools |
Low-Code Tools |
---|---|---|
Customization |
High – Tailored to specific needs |
Moderate – Limited by platform capabilities |
Development Speed |
Slow – Longer development cycles |
Fast – Rapid development with drag-and-drop interfaces |
Expense |
High – Significant initial and maintenance costs |
Low – Lower development costs |
Technical Expertise |
High – Requires skilled developers |
Low – Minimal coding expertise needed |
Control |
Full – Complete control over development and security |
Limited – Dependent on third-party platforms |
Integration |
Seamless – Easily integrates with existing systems |
Variable – May have integration limitations |
Scalability |
High – Can handle complex and large-scale projects |
Moderate – Potential limitations for complex projects |
Maintenance |
High – Ongoing technical support required |
Low – Vendor handles most maintenance |
Accessibility |
Low – Limited to technical staff |
High – Accessible to non-technical users |
Hyper automation refers to the use of advanced technologies such as Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning and Robot Process automation and other emerging technologies to develop more comprehensive and dynamic automation solutions.
Future hyperautomation will focus on automating entire business processes from scratch, rather than just focusing on a single task. This will involve integrating different technologies and developing more cohesive and smart workflows.
As AI models become more precise. hyperautomation will depends on AI to provide real-time decisions, respond and adapt quickly to changing conditions, and optimize processes.
Healthcare, finance, manufacturing, and logistics Industries will in future be seen to use hyperautomation. It can help streamline operations, better customer experiences and reduce costs.
creating and managing automation solutions with no deep technical expertise will help its adoption faster to a wider range of industries and audiences.
To remain competitive in a fast-paced market, organizations must acquire the latest trends and technologies, moving beyond traditional and conservative approaches. The ability to swiftly develop, test, and deploy products has become a critical factor in maintaining relevance and staying ahead of the competition.
When evaluating the return on investment (ROI) in test automation versus productivity gains, it’s essential to realize that the true value lies not just in immediate cost savings, but in the long-term benefits of delivered product quality. Moreover, automated testing increases productivity by reducing manual testing efforts. This allows teams to focus on more strategic tasks like innovation and continuous improvement. The improvements in software quality lead to fewer defects, reduced rework, and higher customer satisfaction, all of which contribute to a stronger market position.
2024 © NoGrunt